Friday, February 09, 2007

Darfur no longer genocide?

Is America changing its stands on Sudan or just tesing the waters by sending mixed signals?

Ambassador Natsio is saying that what is going on Darfur cannot be called genocide any more. It is just a humanitarian catastrophe. It has happened before, but not now. Interesting.

Mixed signals or not, the world is hearing. Is it the carrot and stick? Is it a ploy to placate Khartoum so that they open up a bit?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Yeah, at this point, the situation in Darfur can just be considered anarchy, not genocide.